Muad`Dib aka Anthony John Hill... Not Guilty.

Tuesday, 31 May 2011 01:15 |

Written by Administrator |

This article has been reprinted in Namaste Magazine with insertions from Muad Dib.

The imprisonment and trial of Anthony John Hill aka Muad'Dib (meaning "Teacher of Righteousness" and a character from the Frank Herbert novel Dune) has been round the world in the alternative media and featured on many websites but has been largely ignored by the mainstream media.

A. J. Hill 63, who was originally from Sheffield and moved to County Meath in Ireland made the film 7/7 Ripple Effect about the July 2005 London Tube and bus bombings. In 2008, those accused of conspiring with the alleged 7/7 bombers were sent for trial and A J Hill sent copies of his film addressed to the judge and the jury at Kingston Crown Court. He also sent the film to John Hyman, the father of Myriam Hyman and many others. Full story at http://terroronthetube.co.uk/?s=miriam+hyman

The videos sent to the court were not seen by the judge or jury as the packages of dvds were intercepted by the court's administration staff.

In 1997 Muad Dib put together a massive work entitled "The King of kings' Bible". It contains his work "The Way home or face The Fire", the Bible, plus other texts such as "The Book Of Enoch", the "Gospel of Thomas" The Koran was included along with his understanding and interpretations of these works. There were also references to many other philosophical and religious works. His objective was to bring all this together into a unified whole “for world peace”.

It is this strong philosophical conviction which seems to have sustained him throughout his 157 days in prison. He was never lost for words at the trial and when asked why he had gone to Ireland replied, it was to do research as to the whereabouts of the Lost Ark of The Covenant. This response was to any accusation he may have been trying to avoid the authorities in the UK. His historical and religious research for the trial was backed up by his clear and considered response when being questioned.

It was the three 7/7 alleged conspirators second trial which coincided with the arrest of Muad'Dib and his first imprisonment for 10 days. The first trial of the three accused of conspiring with the alleged bombers to cause explosions had ended with the jury unable to reach a verdict. They were retried on the same charge and two of the three on a further charge of planning to attend a terrorist training camp in Pakistan. See www.terroronthetube.co.uk.

His extradition from Ireland was done with a European arrest warrant as he was not accused of committing any crime in the Republic of Ireland, where he resided at the time. This hearing was held in the High Court in Dublin.

He was released on bail upon condition he would not talk about the film or trial to anyone in England or Wales. He did an interview with Richard D Hall of Richplanet.net from Scotland. http://www.richplanet.net/detail.php?dbindex=256

His barrister told the judge the DVDs were being distributed by many people and were in the public domain. The film had been widely circulated on Google Video, You Tube and on many other video sharing sites. To date it's had over a million views.

Along with 7/7 Ripple Effect other film makers had questioned the official story of 7/7 including "Mind the Gap" and "Ludicrous Diversion".

Ripple effect differs from the other films on 7/7 in that it does not deconstruct the official story but pieces together what was the most likely story given the events. For instance the news that three men had been shot at Canary Wharf (This story which was reported on 7/7 soon disappeared from the official narrative) was from news sources around the world.

This from Terroronthetube.co.uk:

It’s the opinion of Sheffield University social-sciences professor Ridley-Duff, that Mr Hill’s Ripple Effect’s narrative of what happened on that day, is more plausible and better fits the facts than did the BBC’s 7/7 ‘Conspiracy Files‘ program. His well-referenced study focussed very much on what happened at Canary Wharf on that morning, seeing the Ripple narrative, whereby the young alleged bombers had been inveigled into a terror drill that morning, then fled to Canary wharf where they were shot – as the best account yet.

The BBC had asked Muad'Dib for an interview, but he had agreed only under condition they broadcast Ripple Effect. A regional newspaper had also published an unbiased story on Muad'Dib.

The most important point in the whole narrative is that the alleged bombers could not have been at the destinations where the bombs were detonated. The official train times stated that the train the alleged bombers were supposed to have got, was the Luton to King Cross Thames Link 7.40. This train was cancelled, therefore the bombers could not be placed at the scene of the crime with any certainty .

The Ripple Effect narrative states that they must have realised they had been set up and went to Canary Wharf where Reuters and daily Newspapers were based, to tell the press. This would have been their only hope as they obviously could not be seen alive again.

http://terroronthetube.co.uk/latest-77-articles-3/muad%E2%80%99dib-and-ripple/

On 29th November 2010 his first case management and plea hearing was scheduled. He was not in court as he had got lost in the prison system. There were seven attempts to get him to court but only two succeeded. On one occasion he could not be found on the prison register for a court hearing but was nevertheless located at 8am the next morning for a randon drug test. A judge had demanded that he was brought to court after so much apparent incompetence. Muad'Dib states the whole episode was “Designed to punish me for making the film”.

During the official inquest into 7/7 Muad'Dib was again kept out of the public eye and was on strict curfew restrictions as part of his bail conditions.

The inquiry made it clear there would be no deviation from the official story and that there was no question the four were guilty. There were no post mortems into the deaths of the victims even though a makeshift morgue had been set up at an army base the day before the bombings. http://terroronthetube.co.uk/?s=7+7+morgue+at+army+base

The Trial started on May 9th at Southwark Crown Court. He was accused of attempting to pervert the course of justice and had altogether spent 157 days in jail.

There were many supporters and the public gallery overflowed into seating next to the jury box. The attending public had to sit through a case management hearing of another trial before Muad'Dib appeared in the court.

Muad'Dib's defence which had been painstakingly researched and prepared was not a straight forward "Not Guilty". His argument centred around the sovereignty of The Queen and The Crown.

His fascinating defence was that the Queen had knowingly been Crowned and taken her Oath on a fake Stone of Destiny aka Jacob's Pillow which had been removed on 25/12/1950, before the coronation and replaced with a fake stone. Full story and challenge to the Crown by Muad'Dib at:

http://jahtruth.net/britmon.htm

He explained to the judge that he could not be tried by the court as it had no jurisdiction over him. The Queen had summonsed him to the court and she had no lawful right to do so being illegitimate and having knowingly committed treason.

The Skeleton defence of Muad'Dib had been acknowledged by the judge but his papers had not been received by the court. The prosecution barrister maintained that the reply to Muad'Dib's argument had been sent to his barrister “weeks ago”.

The prosecution barrister maintained that the issue of sovereignty was not relevent to the trial as the coronation was a “matter of ceremony”. Muad'Dib quoted the “Prosecution of Offences Act” of 1985, “No bill can be given law without Crown consent” and that the Crown “had no authority to put me on trial”. He also asked whether the judge was an agent of the Crown to which the judge acknowledged he was.

Muad'Dib stated that the Queen had broken the law “thousands of times” and had breached her oath and contract with the British People. The judge stated that Muad'Dib had put up an “articulate argument”.

The judge then called for a break in proceedings and asked the people not in the public gallery to leave as a jury “may be sworn in”. This was not however the case as the jury were not sworn in until Tuesday. The large crowd of around 30 people along the jury and swearng in benches remained in their seats until the security were called. So as not to prejudice the opening of the trial they eventually left. When the proceedings recommenced as many as possible squashed into the overflowing public gallery.

The film "A Queen is Crowned" was shown, the volume remained down for the whole 18 minutes of the film, despite the Clerk being asked to turn it up. The only audible part being the sound of distant heraldic trumpets.

The film made on Coronation day at Westminster Abbey in 1953 showed only two camera angles of The Queen, one from around 30 feet in front of the throne and one thirty feet to the Queen's left. Muad'Diib had alleged this was because the Coronation Stone was replaced with the fake stone. There were to be no close ups which may to the trained eye reveal that the stone could have been replaced with a fake.

When the film finished the judge who had watched it intently on his monitor said, “Thank you very much Mr. Hill.” Muad'Dib said, “I hope you can see the importance of the oath and why The Queen has sworn to uphold God's law”. He also stated the oath had been sworn on a Special Edition Sovereign King James Bible and that the first time she broke the law she was no longer the Monarch. The judge said, “I follow that point”.

When it was stated that the coronation was a religious ceremony, otherwise it would have been held in Buckingham Palace instead of Westminster Abbey, the House of God, the judge had confirmed that this was “certainly the case”.

Muad'Dib stated that any act The Queen had fraudulently given Royal Assent to was not valid and that The CPS got their authority from her, therefore there was no authority to put him on trial.

The judge then said, “I want to look at it overnight, I will give a ruling tomorrow morning at 10 a.m.” The implications of this were truly huge yet the issue was not brought up after the jury had been sworn in.

The jury was shown the whole of 7/7 Ripple Effect and heard Muad'Dib's information on both 9/11 and 7/7. At 4pm on Thursday 12^th May the jury found Muad'Dib aka Anthony John Hill "Not Guilty" of attempting to pervert the course of justice.

Muad'Dib states that the judge ignored all his evidence on the matter of sovereignty and should not have given himself jurisdiction. He also added that the judge had “perverted the meaning of the word pervert” and that the judge had stated to the jury that perverting the course of justice meant to “influence”. Muad` Dib states the judge had emphasised the word “influence” several times to the jury.

The judge had stated that the coronation stone was only “ceremonial” and the charge of attempting to pervert the course of justice under common law was valid as was the jurisdiction of the court.

On a more profound level this information could go further to explain why the sovereignty of the British Isles and its population has been willingly and mercilessly destroyed. It gives insight into where we are now, and why every unalienable right has now been taken away. All this of course without any intervention from and with full complicity of The Queen and state.

Muad'Dib maintained he was trying to prevent the course of justice being perverted. The sending of evidence to a court if in the public interest is not an offence.

The sergeant who was in charge of the investigation and who also extradited Muad'Dib from Ireland said, “I'm sorry,” to Muad'Dib after the "Not Guilty" verdict was announced. The forewoman of the jury smiled after announcing the verdict and said to a member of the public gallery that she was familiar with the Ripple Effect film before the trial.

Muad'Dib remained calm and centred throughout the whole of his trial. He thought before answering questions and always had an answer. After the trial he stated, “If we can wake up 10 out of 12 in court (the jury) thats 80 percent of the population”.

The jury were given a standing ovation from the public gallery. Muad Dib has stated he has no regrets.

“Insanity is believing a lie is true and the truth is a lie” Muad'Dib

Recent interview by Muad'Dib with Jim Fetzer on http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/05/trial-of-muaddib-9-12-may-2011.html

Article Courtesy of www.landofthefree.co.uk

Additional information: www.terroronthetube.co.uk / www.jahtruth.net